Stepashko V. O. Adaptive Management of Student Scientific Research

Stepashko V. О., Associate Professor, Department of Education, Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky Hryhoriy Skovoroda State Pedagogical University.

Abstract
The article deals with the development of the theory of the student scientific research management. The highlights of the theory are the target management based on results; cross-level management; combining external management and self-management; and providing for student self-development. Combination of management and self-management ensures student self-development. Self-management is aimed at self-development. The management of student scientific research is aimed at the development of their creative abilities, formation of their competence by means of creating organizational, educational, and psychological conditions, as well as at the self-organization to encourage self-development. The process of self-development results in a range of qualitative changes, including the increased competency level, the formation of research skills and abilities, etc.
The author comes to the conclusion that the key factor in effective student research management is the implementation of the adaptive principle, which allows the administration of the higher educational institution to achieve the emergence effect and equips the participants of the managerial activity with the adaptive mobility and helps them to realize the preactive management. The efforts of the management process participants, therefore, have to be aimed at the control and analysis of the outcomes, while scientific research should promote the natural development of every student.

Key words: target management, self-management, target functions, preactive management, cross-level management.

References

1. Borova T. A. Teoretychni i metodychni zasady adaptyvnoho upravlinnia profesiinym rozvytkom naukovo-pedahohichnykh pratsivnykhiv vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu [Theoretical and Methodological Basis of Adaptive Management of Professional Development of Research and Educational Workers of in Higher Educational Institution]: Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences dissertation: 13.00.06. Kyiv. 2012. 488 p. (ukr)
   
2. Yevtukh M. Za pedahohichnoiu tekhnolohii (Do pytannia pro novi metodychni pidkhody pry proektuvanni navchalnykh zaniat u vyshchii shkoli) [After the Educational Technique (On New Methodical Approaches to designing a Lesson Plan for a Higher Educational Institution Classroom)]. Vyshchia Osvita Ukraiiny. 2001. No. 1. Pp. 71 – 81. (ukr)
   
3. Yelnikova H. V. Naukovi osnovy adaptyvnoho upravlinnia zakladamy ta ustanovamy zahalnoii serednioii osvity [Scientific Foundations of Management of Comprehensive Secondary Educational Institutions]: Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences dissertation: 13.00.01. Kyiv. 2003. 453 p. (ukr)
   
4. Klokar N. I. Upravlinnia pidvyshchenniam kvalifikatsii pedahohichnykh pratsivnykhiv v umovakh pisliadyplomnoii osvity rehionu na zasadakh dyferentsiiovanoho pidkhodu [Management of Teachers’ Advanced Training in the Context of Post-Graduate Education in the Region: Differeniative Approach]: Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences dissertation. 13.00.06. Kyiv. 2011. 563 p. (ukr)
   
5. Pikelna V. S. Teoriia i metodyka modeliuvannia upravlinskoii diialnosti [Theory and Methodology of Modeling Managerial Activity]: an Abstract of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences dissertation in 13.00.01 General pedagogy and History of Pedagogy. Kyiv. 1993. 44 p. (ukr)

Full text (PDF)...>>